Search for: "T McGinley" Results 1 - 20 of 103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2011, 7:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Substantial similarity isn’t necessarily for a jury. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 3:36 pm by Hani Sarji
“I don’t think there’s anything more significant than the estate tax,” said Catharine V. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:18 pm by John L. Welch
In re Boulevard Entm’t, Inc., 334 F.3d 1336, 1340 (Fed. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:16 am by David DePaolo
"From the time Johnson first sought medical treatment for stress, she indicated that it was due to continual harassment at work based on her gender and race, Justice Bernard McGinley noted. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 10:07 am by Howard Bashman
” In commentary, online at The Los Angeles Times, Amy Hagstrom Miller has an essay titled “A judge’s attempt to restrict medication abortion nationwide shows extremists aren’t done yet. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 3:15 am
William McGinley, Mechanisms and microfoundations in International Relations theory Ellen Gutterman, The legitimacy of transnational NGOs: lessons from the experience of Transparency International in Germany and France [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 4:57 am
Reader and huge fan Richard Nieporent passes along a story of a West Virginia High School student with a 4.5 GPA suing her teacher and the school board because she didn't like the grade she received in biology. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:44 pm by David Jensen
Reporter Laurie McGinley wrote about a clinic in Beverly Hills with a self-described "Time Machine" box.Mark Berman, who was described as the co-founder of the "biggest network of commercial stem cell clinics" in the country, processes stems cell through the box for a procedure that he says doesn't require FDA approval.McGinley wrote,"In mini-liposuction procedures, Berman extracts fat tissue from patients and puts it into the Time Machine box,… [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:03 pm by Leila Wozniak
McGinley On June 22, 2017, the Second Circuit affirmed summary judgment for a defendant in a case of first impression, holding that under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 3:02 am
Moreover, each application must be examined on its own merits, and an error made in some other application cannot justify the improper registration of this applicant's mark.Judge Moore provided 24 pages of "additional views," urging that "[i]t is time for this Court to revisit McGinley's holding on the constitutionality of Section 2(a). [read post]